Author Topic: RakNet 2.454 released  (Read 4603 times)

Rak'kar

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6895
  • Karma: 291
    • View Profile
    • RakNet
RakNet 2.454 released
« on: March 03, 2006, 01:38:39 AM »
  • Master server / Master client now uses Plugin interface.
  • Fixed bug that appeared on Linux where out of older order packets were incorrectly treated as duplicate and dropped. Same fix reduces memory usage by about 400 bytes per player.
  • Reorganized packet resend loop to hopefully fix a reported infinite loop.
  • Added define _COMPATIBILITY_1 to exclude compilation of code that uses alloca, FormatMessage, the security layer, gethostbyname, #include <windows.h>, and inet_ntoa.  This define also changes the default MTU to 1492.
  • Updated documentation for memory synchronization of DataReplicator.
  • Updated FAQ.
  • Added OnDetatch to the PluginInterface.

Silver Hawk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
    • Crestock
Re: RakNet 2.454 released
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2006, 01:49:09 PM »
Hello,

I have a small question. In the readme.txt file, the version number is 2.455 and not 2.454. Which is the corrected one?

Thank you very much.

Best wishes,
Michael

siquan

  • Not-a-newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
Re: RakNet 2.454 released
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2006, 07:43:52 AM »
 I use the source package of speex 1.1.12 to replace 1.1.11.1 that is in the latest RakNet.zip.
And the compilation will be done in Linux.

Rak'kar

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6895
  • Karma: 291
    • View Profile
    • RakNet
Re: RakNet 2.454 released
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2006, 05:48:39 PM »
The readme.txt always has the correct version.  Sorry about the confusion.

Silver Hawk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
    • Crestock
Re: RakNet 2.454 released
« Reply #4 on: March 07, 2006, 03:28:54 AM »
The readme.txt always has the correct version.  Sorry about the confusion.

Thank you very much for the info.

Best wishes,
Michael